Is what is reported what really happened?

As people we are selective about the information sources we listen to, and then selective about what we read, and selective about what we believe, and selective of what we share with others. We get a slice that reenforces our belief system.

And, before we even hear the news, or a research report, or a description of a situation, the information is filtered through those doing the reporting or the research.

Some places where information can get distorted

Interviewers: What are their beliefs going into the situation? How are they designing the research and the interview questions to reinforce those beliefs?

Interviewees: Are they honest and forthcoming? Are they providing accurate responses, or what they feel the interviewer wants them to say?

Writers: Are answers transcribed accurately? Does the report give a valid account of the main findings of the research/interviews? Does the report provide a full picture? What is the “truth” vs the (un)intentional (mis)direction provided by interviewers, interviewees, and writers?

I recently witnessed two people taking notes on a small group discussion. As they looked at the summary of their notes, they started editing out things they didn’t want to be brought up and deleted some of their notes. Just because an item doesn’t align with your strategy or your talking points or your hypothesis, doesn’t mean that voice shouldn’t be recorded.

If I’m observing a group or conducting an interview, I’m pretty good at capturing an accurate picture of what was said. But if I have a vested interest in a meeting — e.g. as a board member or other active team member — I am a HORRIBLE secretary/note taker.  I will take notes based on what I think people are trying to say. I will finish sentences before they have been spoken. I will pause when I don’t agree with something, and ask a question of the speaker that might result in notes not being taken.

Do you do research or reporting? How do you check your biases or hopes or opinions as you prepare information to share with others?

It might be wrong. But is it useful?

I took a class on effective instruction a few years ago. The most powerful take away was almost a throwaway quote from one of the instructors. All models are wrong. But some models are useful. I’ve taken this thought with me far and wide. Some people don’t believe in the MBTI. Fine. (I do). ButContinue Reading

218 content tips for resumes

Just kidding! Not 218 tips. First tip: don’t include EVERYTHING in your resume. Yesterday I shared tips for resume design. Today: content. Recap I have some pretty strong feelings to share, with the caveat that I am just one opinionated person – other people are opinionated in other ways, so a perfect resume for oneContinue Reading

5 design tips for resumes

Earlier this week I gave some advice to young professionals on resumes and cover letters. I have some pretty strong feelings to share, with the caveat that I am just one opinionated person – other people are opinionated in other ways, so a perfect resume for one hiring manager is just “meh” for another. IContinue Reading

When it rains, it pours

I love being semi retired. I like having control over my time. I like downtime, and I like being busy. Paradoxical, I know, but I guess I mean that I like having a strong purpose(s) that drive me everyday, so that I work hard on things that I enjoy, but do it efficiently so that I alsoContinue Reading