Do you know a social innovator or nonprofit leader with conviction?

If they are plodding forward, helping create the change they wish to see in the world through public opinion, education, and policy…they are being political.

Maybe not in the traditional political-party-partisan-campaign-voting sort of way (well, maybe they do that, too!) but they are civically engaged in public work. Perhaps they have veered into other political acts such as protests or petitions or letters to the editor or community organizing.

I want you to consider nominating at least one of these people for the Everyday Political Citizen contest (#EPCitizen) put on by Samara Canada, a non-partisan charity promoting democracy and civic engagement.

Everyday Political Citizen Contest logo

This year I’m proud to sit on the jury of the contest with well-known Canadian personalities such as Rick Mercer, and Shad, the new host of CBC’s q. And some amazing lesser-known folk of all ages and backgrounds working to create the change they wish to see in the world.

What do I need to nominate?

Not much!

  • Your and your nominee’s info: eg name, email, town, Twitter
  • Nominee’s age group (<18, 18-29, >30) and photo
  • 150 words on what makes your nominee a great Everyday Political Citizen

That’s about it! I’m especially interested in some great nominations from BC, so nominate someone or help me promote on social media! Just share this post on Twitter, Facebook, or your other favourite app!

Vancouver Mayor’s Engaged City Task Force final report – a review

Engaged City Task Force cover

Late 2012 I was selected to serve on the Vancouver Mayor’s Engaged City Task Force (ECTF)…and promptly had to step down as I was heading to Spain and Morocco for 4 months.

But I remained interested in the work of the task force, following their “quick starts” released in mid 2013, and recently read the final report [PDF], which was approved at council last month.

About the ECTF and the report

The purpose of the final report was to “dig deeper into the roots of a disengaged and disconnected population,” specifically to

To examine innovative best practices for civic engagement, and seek to make progress on priority issues including improving the way the City communicates with citizens, engages newcomers, new immigrants and youth, consults on policy, increases voter turnout and enables community connection at a neighbourhood level.

City Council requested the ECTF to focus on potential improvements in three areas:

  1. Enabling neighbour-to-neighbour engagement
  2. Increasing civic literacy about, and opportunities for engaging
  3. Enhancing how the City engages with residents, and vice versa

City Council and the ECTF also decided to focus on certain demographics and areas of interest.

City Council requested recommendations that would be relevant to all age groups but asked the Task Force to put a special focus on residents between the ages of 18 and 35. … It also asked the Task Force to explore opportunities to expand engagement through the use of new technology. As well, since the Task Force had members from a number of cultural communities, we decided to also make special efforts to engage newcomers and new immigrants. (p. 15)

My reading lens

The lens I took when reading was: will the results lead to meaningful engagement of those underrepresented in or isolated from current ‘mainstream’ community engagement (who might well be engaged in ways that are not seen by dominant culture)? Or will it lead to more engagement of people that are already engaged?

The report

Firstly, thank you to all the volunteers who served on this committee. Such an endeavour takes time, expertise, compromise, courage for new ideas, and commitment. You had a big hill to climb.

The final recommendations fell under four valuable categories:

  1. Build knowledge
  2. Build capacity
  3. Build trust
  4. Build power

The recommendations run from the specifc (“Create a Public Space Action Association”) to the incredibly vague (“Develop specific strategies for engaging under-represented groups”).

A qualifier re: my thoughts. I admit I am a highly critical person. My instinct is to want to make things the best they can be, and my way of contributing to that is to play devil’s advocate, challenge thinking, and pointing out potential flaws or gaps.


My initial reaction: some gems, with overrepresentation of hipster/artsy/tech ideas, and lacking voices from underrepresented/marginalized populations.



There are a selection of observations and recommendations the report made that I wanted to highlight as being particularly valuable:

Observations/reflections (all direct quotes)

  • accurate information from a trusted source, in a convenient location, delivered graphically and/or in first languages is crucial to engaging community members
  • many organizations are struggling to find, access, and retain affordable (private) spaces in which to bring people together
  • To build trust, several stakeholders stressed the importance of providing extra time for complex planning issues
  • “food encourages people to come out when nothing else will draw them”
  • the need for smaller, localized opportunities for engagement to complement those that that are citywide
  • Many residents expressed an interest in becoming more invested in neighbourhood and citywide decisions, yet were concerned that some groups dominate consultations and can intimidate others with alternative views

Recommendations (all direct quotes, any emphasis mine)

  • “City Hall 101” that employs graphics and animation to describe City processes
  • seek opportunities to increase awareness of 3-1-1 (through civic facilities, but also community groups, churches, etc.), paying attention to its promotion in languages other than English.
  • all internal project briefs include a dedicated budget line for communications and engagement
  • develop an evaluation framework for the selection and monitoring of online tools
  • develop a condo toolkit that helps residents to determine their building’s assets and identify opportunities to promote social inclusion [I started a condo newsletter a few years ago and great things came out of it]
  • provide regular facilitation training opportunities for staff and work to develop guidelines on the elements of a productive meeting.
  • community bulletin board[s]
  • filming public addresses from all of the [election] candidates and then sharing those videos on YouTube
  • work with the local post-secondary institutions on a voting registration drive  to allow people as young as 16 to register to vote [LOVE this idea – register even if you can’t quite vote yet]
  • initiate a process to review whether or not to lobby the Province of BC to extend voting rights to permanent residents
  • take action on campaign finance reform [oh yes! my opinions here]

Hipster/arts emphasis

Oh hipsters. I suppose I could count myself among the margins of this amorphous “group”. Some recommendations include “Create a Public Space Action Association” and talk of potlucks and long table conversational meals. Various civic and community organizations arlready take action in these areas; yes, there is an opportunity to scale up some of these ideas, but the connection to the target demographics of the report was missing. I can’t see how these would further engage the unengaged except at a minute scale.

There was a surprising amount of focus on artist space/cultural venues in this report. Especially considering the lack of focus on other important areas (e.g. Aboriginal voices). While I firmly support the need to make accessible and protect cultural venues, the notes about this in the report seemed very tangential. Perhaps because I’m not a part of the artist community, I’m missing something here. Yes, artists are marginalized in many ways but wasn’t the report meant to focus on youth, newcomers and new immigrants?

Social media/tech

When I see  “social media” or “online community” in any recommendation, I twitch a little. Yes, social media is an important communication tool. Yes, some online communities are successful. However, these just two tools. Used by people with easy access to internet and/or smart phones. Who are statistically more likely to already be more civically engaged. Yes, these are tools that should not be excluded from civic engagement efforts by the city; social media especially is a given. I perceived that perhaps the report included tech-recommendations because the city originally asked for them, not because they are actually meaningful to the original intent of the task force. Especially as the final report acknowledges:

…we found that those who have language barriers or do not use computers and social media are particularly likely to be isolated from important issues and decision-making processes.

Missing voices

Finally, the report is honest in its lack of success in its progress re: underrepresented groups.

“We were limited in our ability to connect with people from traditionally under-represented demographics. … We feel it’s important for us to acknowledge the absence of voices from Aboriginal communities in this process. “

Very unfortunate. To me, this alone is the downfall of the report. The committee acknowledged the trust- and relationship-building that is required to do this work well, and within a ~1 year time frame, success seemed to have insurmountable barriers.

This gap reminds me of two different thoughts I’ve come across in my work. The first is from the infinite wisdom of Twitter, the second came from my interviews on “new ways to advance social good” for a 2013 HRSDC research project.

  1. If you want to involved more [insert marginalized population] in your work, make them the centre of your work. That way you don’t have to invite them in. They already are in.
  2. Plan with a focus on the most-barriered populations. If your work is inclusive to them, it will be inclusive to all.

Reading Appendix B, which lists the events they held, the people they spoke with, the reports they read, I feel there was a missed opportunity to outreach and to work with existing infrastructure to hear diverse voices (i.e. work with partners that engage people where, don’t ask people to come to you). The task force shouldn’t have been expected to build relationships with individuals from scratch, so connecting through others should have been vital.

Recommendation #2, “Develop specific strategies for engaging under-represented groups,” should have been what this report was about. Isn’t it what the city asked the ECTF to do in the first place? Moving forward, this is where the work should focus.

This year is the year of staff creating an implementation plan and benchmarks. I look forward to the outcomes.

Jack Layton and a call for greater civic engagement among young Canadians

I hope that Jack Layton’s much too early passing is a call to action for the next generation of engaged citizens. Jack gave a strong, educated, passionate and positive voice to Canadian politics. We need more of that.

From Jack:

To young Canadians: All my life I have worked to make things better. Hope and optimism have defined my political career, and I continue to be hopeful and optimistic about Canada. Young people have been a great source of inspiration for me. I have met and talked with so many of you about your dreams, your frustrations, and your ideas for change. More and more, you are engaging in politics because you want to change things for the better. Many of you have placed your trust in our party. As my time in political life draws to a close I want to share with you my belief in your power to change this country and this world. There are great challenges before you, from the overwhelming nature of climate change to the unfairness of an economy that excludes so many from our collective wealth, and the changes necessary to build a more inclusive and generous Canada. I believe in you. Your energy, your vision, your passion for justice are exactly what this country needs today. You need to be at the heart of our economy, our political life, and our plans for the present and the future.

While young people get turned off by petty partisan politics and disengage except for the simplest act of voting (and often not even that), partisan politics is the system we’ve currently got. There are many ways to impact this system (examples from the outside are those like Leadnow, Apathy is Boring, and Canadian Women Voters Congress).

Today, I challenge you to make change from the inside. This may seem daunting — getting involved with a political party.

But the very first step is easy. Sign up on a party’s website to volunteer (your postal code will likely get your email directed to your local riding), and see where it goes. No commitment necessary. You don’t need to be a member. You can change your mind later.  Heck, sign up for more than one and see what the people are like. Shop around.

Federal Parties

BC Parties

Vancouver Parties

I made this step earlier this year. Sent my contact information on a Saturday. Was contacted Monday morning. Met the candidate’s office manager on Wednesday. Met the candidate and a host of other volunteers shortly after. I’m still not a member. Still unsure how far I’ll go with this. But I’m better educated for it, and I’m adding to a slowly building critical mass of strong, educated, passionate and positive voice in Canadian politics. Like Jack did.

Please do it. You may surprise yourself.

(cross posted at

Incomplete Thought #3: Which comes first: next generation voting, or civility in politics?

Next generation voter turnout rates are bad in Canada at all level of elections – student government to federal government.

I think this is for a combination of many reasons. Some logistical: it’s a bit of a pain for university students who live and/or spend the majority of their time NOT in their home riding. Some apathetical: there doesn’t seem to be a direct impact on their lives, and their one vote wouldn’t change anything. Some related to frustration: being so disgusted with the decorum of politics that voting for anyone makes their skin crawl.

Note to politicians

Ads target

Because youth don’t come out to vote like other age groups, the youth vote isn’t targeted (and if it is, it would seem that all the next generation cares about is marijuana and tuition). Sure it might be pandered too, but not properly courted. I used to argue that in order to attract the youth vote, politicians needed to make politics more civil, more engaging. But now, I think I’m with Rick Mercer. Youth need to turnout to vote first. Eventually, the pandering will follow.

It is the conventional wisdom of all political parties that young people will not vote. And the parties, they like it that way.

So please, if you are between the age of 18 and 25, and you want to scare the hell out of the people that run this country, this time around, do the unexpected. Take 20 minutes out of your day and do what young people all over the world are dying to do. Vote.

So which should come first? Young voters turning out? Or civil, engaging, relevant politics? Who owes what to whom?


The Incomplete Thought Series is, well, a series of incomplete thoughts. These are thoughts I have not researched, but which have popped into my head and am interested in discussing. Your incomplete or complete thoughts are encouraged.

Executive Director position and Professional Development certificate

Two great opportunities came across my desk, and even though I’m currently keeping it real in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, I had to share.

Executive Director, Take a Hike Youth at Risk Foundation

Deadline: June 30

My friend Michelle is becoming a mother, and her position is open. I have a variety of experiences with Take a Hike as a donor, volunteer and event attendee, and they’ve all been fantastic!

This would be a great opportunity for a younger (in age or career) nonprofit professional looking for challenging but well-supported leadership position.

Read the posting on Charity Village here. They are hoping to hire by mid-July for a mid-August start.

SFU Certificate in Dialogue in Civic Engagement

Deadline: July 10

I completed this certificate in April this year, and also developed online curriculum for the first course in the program. I think this program is highly appropriate for activist and advocates, government employees involved in public engagement, citizen organizers, and private sector employees that have a public role in their work – anyone really with an interest in “strategically addressing issues of public concern.”

The people – faculty, staff, and fellow learners – were diverse, experienced, and encouraging, and I thoroughly enjoyed my time in the program. I was able to use the techniques and principles immediate in my work and was able to explore possible further career interests in dialogue and civic engagement.

Scholarships are available for selected applicants from nonprofit sectors – don’t let the costs stop you from applying.

Read more here.